Edmund
M. McCarthy is President and CEO of Financial Risk Management Advisors
Company. This piece was originally published in his newsletter.
Obviously
the above phrase refers back to that wondrous fantasy “
Alice in Wonderland.” Color the undersigned
and a lot of other old credit hands as the afore-mentioned
Alice! In the third week of March, (a week likely
to escape a lot of notice as most of the worthies who have participated in the
creation of our very own financial bedlam would have been scurrying to ski or
head south for a four, five or more day Easter weekend) the Federal Reserve Bank
“amended the recently announced universal bailout! For the brokers stuck trying to
finance the alphabet soup creations they have sold the likes of Narvik, Norway,
a little town in the Smoky Mountains of Australia and the Florida state run
repository for the state’s unsophisticated muni’s (they thought they had a cash
equivalent!)
WHAT CHANGES DID “BAMBI BERNANKE” AND
HIS MINIONS SNEAK INTO THIS QUIET DAY IN THE MARKET?
We quote
from a press release from an incredibly astute source in the industry which actually
reads the fine print in the stuff regurgitated by our version of a central bank,
but understood by us curmudgeons as the lapdog of the remaining
Wall St.
“Investment Banks.”
Background:
The Fed, as those who have been following the gyrations of this august
institution know, created a new “thingie” loosely called the PDCF or Primary
Dealer Credit Facility (not to be confused with the TSLF, or more formally The
Term Securities Lending Facility or the TAF or Term Auction Facility). The Fed
has met this burgeoning crisis, not only with their usual (and in this case,
panicked) interest rate cuts, but also through the creation of many new
instruments, first for their bank constituency and, more recently, for a
broader defined group, including investment banks which are qualified to bid on
new government issues. Our folks at the Fed need to get Treasuries to this
group and those “thingie’s” such as the TAF or Term Auction Facility, early on
created for the banks a way to get around the unwieldy next day payback of
Federal Funds borrowings. The original idea was that the Fed would give scarce Government
Securities to the “clearing banks” or
takers of “Govies” for 28 days. The Fed was to receive as collateral stuff
known as “Level 1.” We are presuming that this is the Level 1 known under the
Basel Accord as Level 1. Such is the stuff in the “investment banks” that
actually trades regularly and at some kind of spread smaller than the
Grand Canyon.
GET THIS!
From the Fed
THE FIRST TSLF AUCTION WILL BE A LOAN
OF TREASURY SECURITIES AGAINST SCHEDULE 2 COLLATERAL RATHER THAN AGAINST THE
SCHEDULE 1 COLLATERAL PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED”
We are making the assumption (you
know what an assumption can do to the “assumer”), and we may have to take the
consequences - but we are equating Level 1, Level 2, etc. to Schedule 1, Schedule
2 etc.
TO FACILITATE THE OPERATIONAL
PROCESSES OF THE FACILITY, THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS ALSO E X P A N D E D! THE
LIST OF ELIGIBLE COLLATERAL FOR SCHEDULE 2 TO INCLUDE AGENCY
COLLATERALIZED-MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (CMO’S) AND AAA/aaa RATED COMMERCIAL-BACKED
SECURITIES (CMBS), IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED AAA/aaa-RATED
PRIVATE LABEL RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (RMBS) AND OMO-ELIGIBLE
(YOU FIGURE THIS OUT!) COLLATERAL.
Not only have they gone on down to
schedule 2 or “Observable value” stuff, if our assumption is correct, (which, since it ain’t been trading, could be
demoted by a careful observer to schedule 3, “Unobservable values”), they have
snuck in the whole next crisis in COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE GARBAGE YET TO COME!
THE LAST LITTLE SHOCK - AND DON’T SAY YOU
DIDN’T KNOW IT WAS COMING - WILL BE THE BROKERS DOING THE MARKING ON WHAT THEY
SEND THE FED TO GET AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF GOVIE’S, BUT ALSO THE MARGIN WILL
BE ON A TBD BASIS BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE OR, BABY, WHATEVER IT TAKES TO MAKE IT
WORK!
WE HEREWITH RECHRISTEN THE FORMER
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK AS “DUMPSTER OF LAST RESORT!” OR DLR TO HAVE AN ACRONYM IN
PLACE TO BE USED HENCEFORTH.
We have used up so
many capitals in our indignation, righteous or not that we will revert to plain
text. Anyhow, we can see further announcements down the road with suitable
acronyms including AAA/aaa rated card securitizations, auto securitizations,
boat securitizations, airplane securitizations (have to have something for
AIG/Immelt/Welsh), etc. The DLR can fund direct from Hankjob and crew so they
don’t have the fabled liquidity problem. There may be the odd central bank or
sovereign wealth fund somewhere around the world that wonders at the
securitization and purchase by the DLR of any amount of Wall St. Financially Engineered
dreck, but we have private equity and the now commodity denuded hedge funds to
put to work.
All in all, it has
been quite a frenzied period but must be considered another triumph (no matter
how long or brief) for the initiators and ringmasters of the Great Global
Credit and Derivatives Bubble. The Number 5 house on the street was carried out
(litigation to follow, but without the Fed takeout on $30 Billion of Level 3 and
other similar putrid assets, it will be hard to find a resuscitator.) Who knows,
though, the hubris of some (Look at Lewis and the Bear) is beyond belief and
there may yet emerge a prestidigitator. It will take a lot to find the debt
side of any equation.
One question worth
raising and, at least to the eye of this observer, it has not yet been raised,
is the apparent lopsided aspect of this cycle. The havoc, wrought, Armageddon
near quotes to be heard and spikes in the VIX are usually reserved for an
economy much further down the road of deterioration
At the moment, the unemployment rate is near a
record low. The other indices are showing what can be called pre- or early-recession signs but nothing of the significance of past downturns to create
this level of caterwauling. We can only surmise that the investment and big
commercial banks have such a “schmozzle” in Financially Engineered” Securitized
product that they not only have no bidders or market but have precious little
way of simultaneously agreeing on a “mark” for a given piece of dreck to then
conclude a sale. This new “Thingie” lets them all find a mark they can show the
Fed, get the Fed to provide a reasonable margin and, PRESTO!, we have Level 2
liquidity and market just like 2006 with the only change being a single buyer,
the DLR.
This observer has
never been attracted to the “vast conspirator” school of thinking and still is
not, but a thought did occurre on the way to understanding the DLR.
It was obvious
last week that, in addition to the 25bp cut in the middle of the night to the
Discount Rate, the Board would have to come up with another big cut to Fed
Funds. They settled on 75 bps as big enough to keep equities rocking not
crashing with promises of more to come.
The dollar was in
free fall and the commodities and/or that “near commodity/near currency” called
gold, were on a tear. Since the big players were going to get the benefits of
the marvelous TSLF, shouldn’t they help out as the Fed Fund rate was hammered?
In no way would we intimate that there were any planned meetings, cabals or
other get together which could ever be caviled at by the suspicious.
IN A PERIOD WHERE ALL OF THE HEAD
GUYS OF ALL OF THE BIG BANKS, COMMERCIAL AND INVESTMENT, WERE ALL DRAWN TOGETHER
TO ONE EXTENT OR ANOTHER AND GIVEN THE FACT THAT EACH AND EVERY BALANCE SHEET
IN THE ROOM WAS ILLIQUID LOAN LONG AND CAPITAL SHORT!
Is it not possible that the odd word or two
was passed in the course of rescuing the dear friends from Bear (Conspicuously
absent from the decade ago LTCM rescue but the “Ace” of that era was retired
and remarkably light on any Bear exposure) that the Fed was going to have to
cut and cut big along with the midnight ride to the Discount rate. Future
historians can untangle the exigencies requiring that public relations blunder.
Hey, these are all prime brokers. They all lend to the “hedgies” and there is
even some bucks out to some pretty leveraged private equity players, too. The
hedge funds, although they have experienced surprisingly few blow-ups so far (They really
couldn’t be smarter than us, it must be an accident of nature!) are way over-levered
in this oil/precious metals, foreign currency and commodity game. Why don’t we
look for a little more margin, a little less leverage and like magic, the rates
can be hammered down WITHOUT the metals, various other commodities, the
politically important oil and those pesky foreign currencies going into orbit
as the leveraged guys will have to do a great de-leveraging. The Fed and/or
Cabal of Central Banks won’t even be accused of an intervention to support the
dollar.
The “hedgies” and private equity guys and the panicked folk they sold
this trade to will be selling everything else to get the dollar as we
de-leverage them. This all may be an illusion or hallucination on the part of
this observer but it is WHAT HAPPENED! I am beginning to have a new respect for
Bambi/Hankjob: They come up with all of this stuff piece meal so no political
coalition is necessary. It doesn’t even get linked on the surface but is
accepted as one necessary ”thingie” after another. The dollar, which at this
point, yields levels so far below it’s competitors as to look ridiculous, was
briefly held up by a combination of trusses, guy wires and machinations in
other markets that don’t even spook the folks looking for that intervention
which we all know never works for very long. (The question of how long this
jury rigged play of de-leveraging will last is not a concern; we can always
find another “thingie” (technical term). Sad to say, the rebound of the beleaguered
buck couldn’t fight off the oncoming bad news that followed but at least a
brief rally was better than a media frenzy over an admitted or rumored
intervention and that card is left to play at a later date. On top of
everything else we get our balance sheets closer to that mythical safety level. EVERYBODY’S A WINNER!
SO FAR, AT LEAST, THE DELEVERAGING OF
THE WALL ST AND THE BIG BANKS IS HAPPENING WITHOUT WHAT MIGHT BE CALLED A
CRASH; JUST A CRUSH!
My colleague, Doug
Noland, has a must read piece in this week’s Credit Bubble Bulleting on the
Website Prudentbear.com. Once all the thingies are Rube Goldberging their way
out of the current crush, if that is the correct term, the machinations over at
the other Federal Reserve Bank, Fannie, Freddie and the FHLB are going to
require some formal blessing and are in the process of getting it. If THEIR “thingie” (The increase in the top
amount they can lend and the reduction of the Excess Capital requirement
imposed back when it was found that Fannie and Freddie had played with the
numbers so badly they couldn’t produce numbers the Accountants would certify) works
as intended, a ton of Balance Sheet Room will open up in the Investment Bank
Production line as the “Other Fed,” Fannie and Freddie, are again wide open for
business.. Somewhere in the other Fed,
their head minion even opined that, with all of the regulatory easing changes
proposed and in process, “The Other Fed” could produce as much as $1.4 TRILLION
of new mortgage product, balance sheet and/or guaranteed by “The Other Fed”
this year.
Presumably these
“successes” will lead to further relaxation and even more growth thereafter,
competing with the aforementioned newly revitalized Wall St pipelines and
maybe, pray Lord, get a whole new housing boom and bubble re-inflated to
humongous proportions. At a minimum, they will NATIONALIZE effectively some $7
Trillion, at a minimum of housing credit.
DOES ANYONE, ANYWHERE COUNT THE
TRILLIONS OF DEBT/DEBT GUARANTEE THE GOVERNMENT IS SO CASUALLY ABSORBING FOR
TAXPAYERS IN THIS WHOLE EFFORT? The Fed is way over a trillion already, the
nationalization to come by the GSE’s well over a trillion a year, hundreds of
billions of proposed abrogation of foreclosure and debt escalation under way in
legislation and McCain screaming “Bomb Iran.”
WITH THIS ONLY THE VERY START OF A
RECESSION/DEPRESSION, THERE ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE AND MORE TRILLIONS OF
“THINGIE’S” TO COME. HOW IS ALL THIS TO BE PAID FOR?
Not having a clue as to how to answer
that question as the tax increases proposed by the Democratic contenders for
the nomination don’t come close, and McCain wants further tax cuts; we raise
the other unasked and unanswered question.
CLEARLY WHAT THE FED IS GETTING AS
COLLATERAL for all these “thingies” IS NOT STUFF WHICH WOULD BE RATED BY A
REPUTABLE RATINGS AGENCY (IF WE HAD A REPUTABLE RATINGS AGENCY) AS TRULY AAA/aaa
IN SPITE OF IT BEING SO RATED!
HOW LONG IS THE REST OF THE WORLD
GOING TO CONTINUE TO BUY OUR 2 YEAR PAPER AT LOWER THAN JAPANESE OR SWISS RATES
WHEN WE HAVE AT LEAST A $400-500 BILLION DEFICIT IN 2008 AND BIGGER ONE’S AD
INFINITUM AND A TRADE DEFICIT OVER $800BILLION. IS ANYONE ANYWHERE EVER GOING
TO ASK HOW IT GETS REDUCED MUCH LESS REPAID?
It does not seem
so.
We were going to
belabor the next two big problems lined up to come down the pike but will only
have room to do so briefly as, over the weekend, we glimpsed the tip of the
biggest iceberg yet in the credit bubble implosion; the veritable 900 ton
gorilla.
There is no
question in the writer’s mind (and in the minds of a large number of
knowledgeable Commercial Real Estate entrepreneurs the writer has spoken with)
that there is a $Billion plus problem coming for the banks in the loans they
made in the latter stages of the housing bubble to the Commercial Construction
industry. Three reasons are given.
The banks and the
builders got in late on the housing bubble and had to get terms as good as the
sub-primes were getting to make deals work (at cap rates which were predictions
of lower left to upper right) and the banks had to find a double digit growth
bubble to take over from flagging residential.
THE THIRD REASON WAS THE USE OF THE
“CMBS” WHICH PRACTICALLY DIDN’T EXIST IN PREVIOUS CYCLES. AS WITH MOST OF THE
ALPHABET SOUP, HERE ARE A LOT OF THESE DONE BOUTIQUE STYLE BETWEEN BUILDER AND
FINANCIER (HEDGE FUND-PRIVATE EQUITY) AND NOT AS READILY EVIDENT AS THE DAYS
WHEN THE OCC ALWAYS WANTED TO LOOK THERE FIRST IN THE BANKS.
The other big one
(we won’t bore you with the mundane under a Trillion card problem to come or
the fractionated losses on loads of upside down autos (they don’t run well in
that position). We are talking about the magnificent world of home equity. With
the exception of the rare state of the State of Texas, where 20% equity has to
be in the home to make home equity loans, the last few years have seen the
magic Trillion dollar mark exceeded in this new game of home equity loans and
lines. They were just magnificent fodder for securitization with the generous
interest rates a second lien can command and still leave lots on the table for
all concerned. In most places 105% loans, piggyback loans and other monikers
emerged as all sorts of originators came. Like termites, out of the woodwork to
lend the real and/or fictitious equity in your house to you to go forth and
keep spending.
It may be the curmudgeon in me but I
wonder how many buyers of the thereafter “financially engineered” securitized
product were “fully informed” of the fact that, if a first lien stood in front
of them (and almost inevitably it did) the only way out for their servicer to
realize any “equity” in the event payments stopped, was to pay out that pesky
first lien (usually by then 100% of the “equity”) without even taking into
consideration legal fees and other miscellaneous fees in order to accomplish
this. Who knows? Maybe Hillary to the rescue will buy out all those firsts
using a pile of taxpayer money.
Enough on these
pesky problems, let’s get to the BIG ONE!
As past readers
know; I have been railing about something called the credit default swap market
for years now.
I has always
puzzled me how all of the powers that be (You know who I am referring to) could
ignore something that globally grew to $44 Trillion + in a very short time.
Unlike interest
rate and foreign exchange swaps, this derivative (recent history has proven)
has the capacity for actual risk to approach or even reach 100% of notional
risk.
For, as a famous
writer calls them “Newbies” by the time netting (another arcane term we will
let pass) is completed, real risk in interest rate and foreign exchange
derivatives seldom get up to much less over 1% of notional and 3% would be
historic. Therefore, powers that be, maybe something toxic enough to rise in
risk to 100% should have gotten more notice.
The trading and
creation of this stuff was done by phone and Bloomberg largely.
It was so sloppily
done, the Fedhead NY a couple of years ago had to get excited and demand that
the +30% of deals done were unconfirmed be dealt with. (There apparently is
some teens % hanging out there without complete documentation.
The fees were
gorgeous and obviously so were the rewards to all the players in the chain.
What essentially
was a pure insurance product got dolled up as a derivative. Therefore, no
reserves were required. Collateral might or might not be there in whole or in
part depending on whether the coffee was from Dunkin Donuts or Starbucks.
Capital was way back in some distant parent not in the entity doing the deal.
Can you imagine insuring your house with a company with no reserves and no
capital and without a written and verifiable policy? Welcome to parts of the
$44 Trillion world of credit default swaps.
Awhile ago, the
first crack in this Hoover dam full of toxic material appeared when a company
named Aon (fine firm with rating and reputation which had written one of these
things) paid out a measly $10 mil and then sought to collect from the
“counterparty” they had bought a hedge from. Lo and behold, there was some
difference of opinion on Aon’s right to collect. Resolution to follow as not
presently known to the writer.
Over the weekend,
in the Credit Bubble Bulletin, Doug Noland picked up on some difficulty Merrill
was having on collecting on some $3.1 Billion in this wonderful world of credit
default swaps. It’s not clear to Merrill why they didn’t get the $3.1 Billion
(They already have plenty of writeoffs/downs and are going to fight).
My point made
earlier is we are in the very early stages of economic slowdown and credit
defaults are few, but if this “thingie” is an example of what happens when they
get worse. Credit default swaps may well be bigger than anything so far seen in
the media might surmise.
|